On the one hand Grillo got a lot of support (he has valid points), on the other some of his views are myopic to say the least.
Did Italians not expect that if they voted for Grillo and Berlusconi that it would throw the enconomic markets in a tizzy?
So what has been the reaction to the financial market turmoil?
Do Italians expect anything to happen before a new president is elected? How did they react to the results?
—








I don't think Italy should be all that concerned with markets. It's only a matter of confidence in the end. I am anti the euro and have been from the start. In my opinion Italy, and many others, would be far better without it. You can't put Greece and Germany in the same pan and expect harmony!!!
I would far prefer to see Italy go it alone. They have very large debt (so does just about everyone!!) but they do have a good means of getting out of the mess they're in if they can be free of Germany and Brussels!
Just my 2 (euro) cents.
At this point I’m starting to think that it’s me who doesn’t understand, but I never know how to answer this type of question.
Who is “Italians”? How can anyone say what “Italians” think? Some Italians are on the left, others on the right, some read the newspaper every day and are informed and knowledgeable, others never bother reading anything; some love politics, some hate it; some love the EU, others think we’d be better off out of it. “Italians” comprises a lot of heads and just like all groups of people we come in many different shapes and colours.
I’ll be glad to express an opinion on how I see things, if asked, but if the question is about what “Italians” think, count me out: I don’t know.
Good point, JA.
Italian voters made M5S Italy's single most popular political party while also giving the greatest plurality of votes to the PD coalition. The result is that the PD must either find common ground with M5S or with PdL. It will not be possible for a minority to govern alone in this Parliament. That's probably good for increasing the focus on promoting employment, and that's the #1 issue for voters, not whether the stock market is up or down 5 points on Tuesday.
JAP - of course you are right. However you are an Italian in Italy, and you have a better insight into what is happening in Italy (hopefully) than an Italian who has lived 40 years in Australia.
Some expatriates who have integrated into the Italian culture and who speak Italian will also have a better insight (IMO) to what is happening than some Italian who has spent 40 years in Australia.
It all varies, you have to acknowledge that being "local" gives a person a different perspective and insight into the problems. And I don't see why you can't give your own personal view.
A topic is there only to meander and morph into something different and interesting. A story always has legs.
Pauly - with the greatest respect markets do matter.
Italy needs jobs and jobs are created by investment into new industries, etc. If there is no investment then there are no jobs. There has to be confidence in the markets and economy of the country in order to invest and create jobs.
Personally I think it would be the dumbest thing under the sun if Italy left the Euro. There is inter EU trade that takes place. Italy supplies German manufacturing.
Leaving the Euro would make Italy an economic pariah for the next 30 years. One needs to look at other countries as to what happened in the last 30 years (and before). Examples Argentina, Indonesia (SE Asia in the 1990's), etc.
Capital/investment is now global, it's not regional. Problems may be regional, but capital is global.
Markets do matter, as does the increased spread for Italian bonds which makes borrowing more expensive.
I think what the northern European media (and possibly "brussels"
haven't taken into account is that the vote wasn't just a protest against Monti's austerity and reforms but as a protest in general against the political class and gerontocracy. I don't think Grillo is helping the situation now, I don't have a TV and haven't read the newspaper for a few days so I'm not up with whatever horse-trading is being reported, but I'm not sure what his _strategy_ is, let alone his tactics.
Now I've suffered from the reforms (losing my school work due to cost-cutting) but I still think labour market reforms are necessary. Monti represented some serieta' after Berlusconi, and the markets appreciated that, but I really don't understand Italian politics and beyond these few brief lines I'll refrain from commenting. I'll still chat with friends who are interested, but there's a lot of shoulder-shrugging and resignation from many, and that's the worrying thing.
Stock markets and currencies hate uncertainty. If Italy is constantly worried about the markets then they'll always be under the thumb of Germany etc.
Of course the short term would be hard, but I wouldn't just foresee Italy leaving. Is Italy really better off now it has the Euro than before? I have no statistics but I would seriously imagine not.
What on earth did countries do before the Euro came along? There is little communion between EU member states, countless languages, countless traditions and countless approaches.
Italy's lack of growth is not simply due to low investment, neither is the unemployment problem, especialy with young people.
Huge reforms need to take place here, as in the UK, as in France as in the USA and the majority of countries. The economics just don't work. It can't be growth, growth, growth, spend, spend, spend. We reach a point of saturation in the end.
Anyway, we won't be solving any problems here, and these are just opinions. My economics training ended at A level. There are experts both for and against.
I am extremely wary, though, of other countries motives for which government Italy does or does not form. Whichever path they choose should be primarily for the good of Italy, not other EU and Euro countries.
Folks, the problem is lack of demand -- people aren't buying goods and services in sufficient quantities. Businesses don't invest if there's no possibility of selling their goods and services, and all the business incentives and giveaways in the world won't change that. This isn't complicated. It's classic depression economics: financial crises followed by private sector deleveraging (i.e. spending less) which crashes consumption.
Nothing will fix this problem unless and until somebody consumes more goods and services. And the classic, proven solution is counter-cyclical fiscal policy. We know that works, and we know the opposite (pro-cyclical fiscal policy in a depression) deepens and elongates the depression. I would very much prefer that World War III and neofascism not be the form that counter-cyclical fiscal policy takes. (That's another lesson from the 1930s. My preferred counter-cyclical fiscal policies would be the U.S. Works Progress Administration and Civilian Conservation Corps, also programs from the 1930s which worked brilliantly to reduce unemployment.)
Lack of demand is the problem Europe has (in spades), and counter-cyclical fiscal policy is the only solution proven to work. Everything else is a misdirection and/or misdiagnosis.
I get some of my information from some British and American press, where I find that sentences like “Italians keep voting for Berlusconi” or “Italians gave their vote to Beppe Grillo” are absolutely common. Also, interestingly, I’ve found that about 50% of the articles about politics in Italy published on the British press (not so much on American papers) contain the word “Mussolini”. I imagine that must be somehow familiar and comforting to that specific readership.
The problem with this “Italians do this” thingy it that it creates, in the reader’s mind, the idea that “Italians” are a sort of uniform mass of undistinguished entities all doing the same things and thinking the same way and being, well, Italians.
As a consequence, every time I meet someone from an English speaking country, knowing very well how he/she most likely gets their information from (because I have the same sources as they), I feel I have a sort of stigma: I know they see a dumb Berlusconi elector in me, and I have the onus to prove that, uh, we happen to be just as articulated here as in the place they come from, duh, and my political views happen to be quite different from what they’ve been led to believe, and so the views of more or less 80% of the Italian electorate - to which they often come up with something as smart as “you don’t sound like a typical Italian” and I’d like to slap them.
Now, I know that newspapers have to sell copies to people, and that people don’t like to be challenged much in their beliefs, but from the people on this forum (sorry gm
) I expected something better than "
id Italians not expect that if they voted for Grillo and Berlusconi that it would throw the enconomic markets in a tizzy?” (answer: some didn’t even know, some didn’t care, some knew and still didn’t care. Italians.).
Rant over.
As for the results.
I am a PD voter. I have a (centre)-left leaning, I am what used to be called a progressive. I don’t mind high taxes in exchange for good universal services. The models I look at as the ones to be inspired by are the Scandinavian countries, or closer to home France, or closer still, let me say Emilia-Romagna, where I consider myself lucky to live. So my point of view is biased, but you know the bias now, so there.
My preferred outcome would have been a PD victory. Alternatively, a PD victory made possible by Monti’s support. Unlike many of the people who vote like I do, I like Monti a lot, I appreciate his competence, his dedication to the Italy cause, and his professionalism and seriousness. I’m a convinced Europhile (simul stabunt vel simul cadent) and, probably unusually for a leftie, I’m in favour of the so called “rigour” and of the fiscal discipline Monti was trying to impose on the Country. Backed up by a Left majority in the Parliament, Monti would have had to implement his policy with a keen eye on the social aspects of his actions, hitting the privileged and tax-evading ones, and favouring a social, inclusive approach.
Unfortunately (for me) the voters have chosen differently.
Paradoxically, this could be an even more left-wing government than the one I hoped for. An interesting aspect often overlooked, and probably not really understood, by foreigners, is that for the first time in the Republican history, the so called “moderati” (the Christian centre, the **YAWN** defenders of the traditional values and bla-bla-bla) are totally marginal in the Parliament. That is: it is possible to form a majority that backs up a Government, without them. Never ever happened before. It’s a unique opportunity, and one it would be just too dumb to miss.
On a series of things, the Left and the M5S converge a lot, so at this point, what I wish would happen is a PD-5 Stelle government able to do all the things many other European countries have done before and we haven’t yet because of the mephitic influence of the Church: legalize gay marriages, citizenship to the offspring of immigrants, strict anti-corruption laws, get rid of Berlusconi once and for all, and all those things that the “ancient regime” never wanted to implement, a shared agenda to modernize Italy and some of its laws, and maybe go back to vote two years from now in a completely changed scenario.
But being the Movimento 5 Stelle an anti-establishment movement by definition, since being anti-everything is a (silly) founding value of theirs, there’s a strong resistance to this. I’m afraid that this historical possibility will be lost for the stubbornness and the lack of common sense of Beppe Grillo and of a good chunk of his supporters. The movement is currently undergoing an internal debate on whether to “soil their hands” and engage in politics for real, or keep their virginity at the cost of making the country yet more unworthy of credit (markets do matter, Pauly).
What will happen, nobody knows. Really, lots of possibilities are open. Let’s wait and see. There’s nothing more that can be said at the moment.
Thanks, interesting post and chimes in a lot with what I and my friend talked about. Like you I gave a lot more credit to Monti whereas he gave none, but we agreed on - as you put it - the lack of common-sense of Grillo.
Now leaving aside the simplistic approach that the foreign media take in all such situations, there is a reasonable and specific question which informs their view that is never satisfactorily explained: who votes for Berlusconi and why? It's just that I've never met anybody who admits to voting for him, but maybe that's just the company I keep.
Pages